<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lac Phillippe vicinity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guidegatineau.ca/xc-ski-trails/2010/02/06/lac-phillippe-vicinity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guidegatineau.ca/xc-ski-trails/2010/02/06/lac-phillippe-vicinity/</link>
	<description>A GuideGatineau  partner blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Lorenson</title>
		<link>http://guidegatineau.ca/xc-ski-trails/2010/02/06/lac-phillippe-vicinity/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Lorenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidegatineau.ca/xc-ski-trails/?p=394#comment-61</guid>
		<description>It might be difficult to hang this on Demsis as #56 is a back-country trail - in past years it was &quot;compacted&quot; with a snowmobile periodically. However, with the new regime of not tracking backcountry trails the question is why a snowmobile was used. If it was for access to the Lac Richard yurt then  there would be no need for using #56 - it can be accessed via the Eardley Side Road - it&#039;s only 1 km from the road.  Certainly, a skied track would have been superior to wwhat you describe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be difficult to hang this on Demsis as #56 is a back-country trail &#8211; in past years it was &#8220;compacted&#8221; with a snowmobile periodically. However, with the new regime of not tracking backcountry trails the question is why a snowmobile was used. If it was for access to the Lac Richard yurt then  there would be no need for using #56 &#8211; it can be accessed via the Eardley Side Road &#8211; it&#8217;s only 1 km from the road.  Certainly, a skied track would have been superior to wwhat you describe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.143 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 18:41:35 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
