Gatineau Park News News of the Gatineau Park

19Mar/104

NCC Responds to GPPC Criticism

The NCC has issued the following open letter in response to the GPPC news release of March 17 entitled Conservation Plan an Empty Shell:

March 19, 2010

Open Letter to Gatineau Park Protection Committee

Jean-Paul Murray, Co-Chair

RE: Gatineau Park

It is unfortunate that the Gatineau Park Protection Committee is still not satisfied with our latest efforts to protect the park (re: Gatineau Park Ecosystem Conservation Plan).

The Committee continues to perpetuate the idea that the NCC has allowed 119 houses, 5 new roads, a major grocery chain, gas station and a donut shop to be built within the park since 1992. As we have attempted to communicate on various occasions, the boundary rationalization exercise in 1997 includes the acquisition of Meech Creek Valley and excludes some parcels that were within the 1960 perimeter. However, overall the 1997 boundary is 700 hectares greater than the 1960 perimeter. Neither the grocery store, nor the donut shop often mentioned by the Gatineau Park Protection Committee was ever in Gatineau Park -- not within the 1960 perimeter and not within the 1997 boundary.

We wish the Gatineau Park Protection Committee would focus more on the positive things the NCC has done, and continues to do to ensure the environmental stewardship of Gatineau Park, rather than focusing on events in the past.

The Committee is also concerned with residential development in the park and so is the NCC. However, the Committee suggests that the NCC has jurisdiction on private properties located within park limits, which we do not have. We have chosen to focus our efforts on acquiring as much as possible of the developable land because, once we own the land, we control and manage it. Since the adoption of our renewed approach for land acquisition in Gatineau Park, in January 2008, the NCC has acquired 25 more properties representing an additional 150 hectares. With this the NCC has potentially prevented the construction of more than 150 houses in the Park. Today 99% of the land in the Gatineau Park is publicly owned.

We would like to take this opportunity to remind the Committee of several recent NCC initiatives.

  • We are currently implementing the 2005 Gatineau Park Master Plan, from which came our Gatineau Park Ecosystem Conservation Plan and will come our Green Transportation Plan for Gatineau Park, Gatineau Park Recreation Plan and Gatineau Park Heritage Preservation Plan.
  • Gatineau Park boundaries were clearly identified in1997 and in 2008, our Board passed a motion to reconfirm these boundaries, further emphasizing the NCC's desire to protect this natural space.
  • There is ongoing, open dialogue and collaboration between the staff of the NCC and groups that share our interest for the park. In the past year more than 20 meetings have taken place with these groups. I personally meet at least twice a year with the Gatineau Park Conservation Coalition.
  • The NCC signed, in October 2008, a collaboration protocol with the municipality of Chelsea which helps to ensure a better protection of Gatineau Park.
  • In 2009, the NCC launched and is pursuing a corporate Environmental Strategy whose objectives include enhancing biodiversity in Gatineau Park and in the Greenbelt.
  • With respect to the committee's concerns about Meech Lake shore, in the Fall 2009, the NCC began work to rehabilitate the shoreline on NCC lands. As for the privately owned lands along Meech Lake, they fall outside of the jurisdiction of the NCC but we intend to call upon residents to help in the restoration of the shores.

Where we find some common ground with the Gatineau Park Protection Committee is a desire to protect Gatineau Park. We are therefore baffled by the committee's criticism of our latest effort, the Gatineau Park Ecosystem Conservation Plan, for which we collaborated with local environmental groups, the scientific community and experts, and whose very goal is to protect the park.

By continuing to work together with the users, residents, and friends of the park as well as the environmental and scientific communities we will make sure future generations enjoy this treasure we have in our region: Gatineau Park.

The National Capital Commission acknowledges that to ensure the protection of this capital gem that is the Gatineau Park, a sustained and collaborative effort is needed. We are prepared and willing to do it.

Marie Lemay, P.Eng., ing.

Chief Executive Officer

*********

Over at the Ottawa Citizen Ken Gray (The Bulldog) includes with his publication of the above letter some material that had earlier been issued by the GPPC, indicating that it is what prompted the NCC response. However the piece titled Conservation Plan an Empty Shell is yet another piece of text visible here.

Comments (4) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Dear Chipper (Charles),

    Well, you got it wrong … And the Citizen’s Ken Gray got it right.

    Although Lemay’s letter says it’s in response to the GPPC’s press release, that’s a red herring to draw attention away from Lemay’s major screw up over visitorship figures, and my email pointing to such (see below). In fact, had it been a response to the release, she would have addressed her letter to Andrew McDermott. Doesn’t take a Phd in hermeneutics to figure that out…

    As for Lemay’s claim on the Loblaws having never been in the park: sorry: NCC and Quebec government maps prove otherwise (see maps section of the GPPC web site: http://www.gatineauparc.ca).

    The only park boundary with any legal validity is the 1960 one. NCC submissions confirm that to change the boundary would require a new Order in Council. Well there has never been an Order in Council or other legal instrument to set the park’s so-called 1997 boundary. Ergo: the Meech Creek Valley, though it may be National Interest Land Mass, it isn’t “legally” in the park. Another NCC swindle (see Senator Spivak’s Question of Privilege blowing the lid of this deception — November 22, 2005, Senate Debates).

    Moreover, there is not one single claim in Lemay’s letter (save for the so-called initiatives) that is not a sitting duck waiting to be blown out of the water … with facts, not rhetoric. To which I will get to later…

    * * * * * *
    March 18, 2010

    Ms. Lemay,

    You just keep tripping over your feet on Gatineau Park …

    Wow… saying park visitorship has nearly tripled over the last 30 years — as you did during your press conference — CTV News, March 17 — is yet another major screw-up. They just keep adding up…

    Funny thing is, the 1980 NCC Master Plan (p. 9) says you don’t know what you’re talking about:

    “Since Gatineau Park first opened, the number of visitors has grown more numerous year by year, and in 1978 over two million persons made use of the park.”

    That’s persons, not “visits.”

    What part of checking the facts and challenging your bureaucrats to get at the truth don’t you understand?

    The NCC is supposed to make me proud to be Canadian; well, the way you’re messing up the Gatineau Park file is — seriously — making me ashamed to be Canadian… And that takes a lot of doing.

    What is it the Kingsmere Property Owners’ Associatioan said about you during the Kangaroo Court/Transport Committee hearings on Bill C-37? “An outstanding CEO”? Indeed …

    Words are not just sounds; they have meaning…

    Sincerely,

    Jean-Paul Murray

  2. Dearest Chipper,

    Ms. Lemay’s pretend response to the GPPC’s press release says she meets — twice a year — with an imaginary group called the “Gatineau Park Conservation Coalition.” Well, there is absolutely no record of this group, its principles, achievements or membership.

    More evidence of Ms. Lemay’s cluelessness on the Gatineau Park issue. Wasting her valuable time with fictitious pretend groups.

    Shame on her.

  3. I enjoy how Ms. Lemay says:

    “By continuing to work together with the users, residents, and friends of the park as well as the environmental and scientific communities we will make sure future generations enjoy this treasure we have in our region: Gatineau Park.”

    It reminds me that the Park stands the best chance when all three groups(residents, visitors and stewards) work together…

    Now, Ms. Lemay, if you wouldn’t mind, can you please have the missing culvert replaced at the ‘hang glider’ parking lot. Even though no one was using the launch site, the lot remained active throughout last fall.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.